Just wanted to say I agree with you, I think this article is offensive and unnecessary. Yes, it's all public information, and anyone bored enough to want to research this can do so. But making an actual (or online) newspaper article about it just feels wrong to me. If my friends and family saw my home on this list I'd be "lovingly" taunted about it til the day I die! Also, wanted to say that with the exception of this article I really do enjoy The Patch!

"Do you realize that all of this is all public information? Also, did you buy your home on July 27, 2007 for $249,900 from Kris Hardenbrook and Allison Drew?"

Wrong. Just becuase they print it on the internet doesnt mean its true.

Also , my comment about the article having no class was about the ARTICLE , not the person writing it. We all say and write things the aren't classy. I do it all the time. I am in no way suggesting that the person writing this meant to offend people or has no class.

I just simply think if that where my house or my parents i'd feel bad, and i bet many other people would too.

Again, one of the issues with this is its based on public record which isn't always accurate. Broheim, your attempt to show off some internet skills has proven this. It's not correct.

"Also, did you buy your home on July 27, 2007 for $249,900 from Kris Hardenbrook and Allison Drew?"

Nice Links - But read them and answer that question. You got your information wrong.

It would seem that Broheim doesn't have the guts to use his full name. Probably afraid someone might look him up on that public record of which he speaks.

"So why is Broheim allowed to post under a false name? Also, why is he allowed to tell another poster he has no brain, and act like a psycho stalker and post personal information about other posters?" I'm glad someone else asked that. I wondered. Rules said no name calling, but yeah , he did say great job on the article.

Maybe you can only name call and and kinda semi stalky if you agree and say great job. Hmm. That sounds reasonable.

Does the full name rule not apply to Broheim? I would not flag his comments as inappropriate. He should be free to insult anyone he likes. Just like Molly. But what is an opinion worth without a name?
Sorry....just some grumbling from a "sensitive" Danvers resident.

Has it occurred to the other sensible types that Brohiem might be a little more familiar or connected to the patch then us? Because again, the rules state that we have to use our names, hence I used mine, but the rule apparently doesn't apply to him. He's probably the Patches web person, or a friend of the Patch. But i don't know. He knows who I am and can splash it all over the internet, but we don't get to see who HE is. Something smells funky...and the longer they leave it uncorrected and in blatant violation of their posting rules that they have apparently enforced before with others, the more this looks like their in house guy.

We do ask that everyone respect the rules laid out in the terms of use. Patch's comment section is self-policing so if you see something inappropriate, flagging the comment three times will remove the comment from the site. Brohiem's comments have been removed from the site. We do ask that Brohiem go by his real name as well.